Mentions Norway as “mostly hydro” and a major producer of “solar grade silicon” and silicon solar cells; discussion of gas exports (“export gas to us”); references to oil and gas wealth and the sovereign wealth fund (“sell fossil fuels to the rest of the planet”, “immense wealth”, over $1.7 trillion).
Created 19 hours ago • 22 documents • Range: 4/5 5:32am – 4/5 10:37amInterested in how the Mail thinks drilling in the North Sea will make all our lives easier when it's all in private hands, and is such a small % of global output that it has no real bearing on oil and gas prices worldwide. I wonder what the chain of reasoning is leading to such a conclusion?
Even is the NS could supply all the UK's gas at low prices new drilling would still be the wrong thing to do. The science is clear: no new oil and gas is needed. www.carbonbrief.org/iea-reiterat...
That's great. The only problem is their renewables mix is basically hydro power, which is not scalable to many other areas of the world. re that are scalable, like solar and wind, are intermittent producers and heavily rely on gigantic production and storage arrays with huge eco footprint
honestly we're doing great at the task we've been put to Norway put their effort toward moving to renewable energy, and they are 99% of the way there the US put their effort toward making about 30 people richer than God at the expense of absolutely everything else and we are NAILING IT EVERY DAY
"Meanwhile in Canada the liberal party of Carney is doing what they are mandated to do by China and the Globalist https://blossom.primal.net/0410059d1d89fb2ff1fdb482b85ee4967e7526c76671b4dfadaf8f4c8a7fa633.jpg"
Nope. It's $11 or $12 Canadian buckaroos.