Conversations contrast Dave Chappelle (described as inspiring “transphobic cultural norms” or being “just a transphobe”) with JKR, who is repeatedly described as saying she “uses profits to fund transphobic organizations.” Threads focus on material support, selling/earning as endorsement, and moral judgments about financially enriching creators linked to anti‑trans activity.
Created 7 days ago • 14 documents • Range: 3/25 4:36am – 3/25 8:23amthe fuck it isn't. Look, if SHE tells you she is not only going to use any money she gets from you to hurt trans people, and also says that any support for her work AT ALL means you support her views, and you engage with it ANYWAY, yes, you are a bad fucking person. and yes, its about trans people
She has financially supported organisations and legal campaigns that have actively pushed cases and arguments against trans inclusion in law and policy. Whatever excuse ppl use, those $$ and platforms are part of the broader ecosystem driving real-world legal and political pressure on trans rights.
If you dig your copy of a fondly remembered novel by an abuser out of the closet, quietly read it and put it back, you are all good to go! If you buy the new edition, stream the show, and never stop talking about it, you are now funding and giving more opportunities for abuse.
Yes, one can make this argument. But this artistic collaboration doesn't exist in a pristine bubble devoid of social context. And the context here is that the creator has explicitly stated that she sees sales as endorsement, and that she uses the profits to fund anti trans organizations/initiatives
This might sound like petty BS, but if you know her history and who she's associated with(potentially dating), you know this is likely going to be funding JASONAFEX AND KABIAR. If you do not know who those two are, I urge you to Google them. Please REPOST this where you can. These are bad people