Posts express distrust in politics (e.g., "POLITICS ... is defined by lies"), skepticism of politicians' anti‑corruption rhetoric, calls for "corruption busting," term limits, and fixed Congressional income. Includes Italian-language debate framing a judicial reform as "questione esclusivamente corporativa" and referencing a constitutional referendum and magistrates' opposition.
Created 6 days ago • 44 documents • Range: 2/8 10:07pm – 2/9 2:40amEvery time I hear a politician bemoan the impact of a scandal on the "trust in politics itself", I don't know whether to laugh or cry. The arrogance or naivity to assume that the public has even the merest vestige of trust in politics - *POLITICS* - is astounding. It's defined by lies.
most modern politics are motivated by everyone desperately wanting to prove they were right 10-25 years ago. the more wrong you were, the more you have to make yourself insane. we live in a timeloop and we will do 2016 over and over again until someone admits they were cringe in 2012.
Until real #corruption busting happens that sends lots of folks in both parties to jail and permanently bars them from public service alongside #TermLimits and fixed Congressional income legislation, I'm just going to assume every politician talking about corruption is using it for marketing.
"Stiamo discutendo civilmente da ieri sera sul referendum costituzionale. Due correnti di pensiero opposte si confrontano senza insulti, senza eccessi, con argomenti e con rispetto. Evviva Bluesky."
Sì, ritengo sia una questione esclusivamente corporativa.
There is a difference between issues, or an issue, based on an individual (as you've reduced the situation to there), and the issues impacting people on a national scale. I would also add that economic hardship empowers populists, who shift political narratives with the electorate...