Posts criticize a candidate (referred to as “Kat”) as a “26-yr-old carpetbagging influencer” focused on TikTok rather than a serious campaign, claim she is “not running a campaign at all” with no in-state staff (only DC consultants), and also assert she “actively campaigned for Dems” but was “ignored, attacked.”
Created 3 days ago • 16 documents • Range: 12/27 10:30pm – 12/28 2:25amShe actively campaigned for Dems. Again, she did/said all that mattered, when it actually mattered. She clearly articulated the stakes & forewarned of present outcome. She was ignored, attacked, told to go away. Can’t keep making demands of her after ignoring/disrespecting her. She owes you nothing.
I’m not sure all the councilors would agree with that specific assessment of her tenure, but i agree big picture that’s certainly the ideal and i certainly acknowledge it’s an especially difficult needle to thread with this ideological split on council and in this first year of the new system.
Kat's a 26-yr-old carpetbagging influencer with no connection to the district she purports to want to represent so it's not surprising her campaign isn't serious. It's more about getting attention on Tik Tok than winning. Hopefully she won't do damage to better candidates who truly want to govern